Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Obama Continues To Lie About Earmarks

Hope and change has turned into outright deceit for the Obama administration. First, he had the audacity to claim that the pork laden stimulus bill 'didn't have a single earmark'; now, he is throwing his support behind ANOTHER $410,000,000,000.00 pet project pork-bill that will do nothing but run up the debt and inflation. In his first 100 days Obama has

  • Lied about not allow lobbyists into the White House, half of his cabinet are big money lobbyists.
  • Lied about the stimulus including tax cuts (oooh 13 dollars a week! THAT will fix things)
  • Lied about there being no earmarks in the stimulus.
  • More than doubled the deficit
  • Undone the widely supported welfare reform of 1994
  • Caused the stock market to dive every time he has made a speech
  • Presided over the worst 2 months the stock market has ever seen
Obama has simply been a colossal failure. He his indecisive, free-money-for-everyone-except-those-who-work-for-it has already almost guaranteed that your children will be worse off than you are. It is a disgrace, and a crying shame that the first African American president would be such a terrible leader that his incompetence would outshine the historic accomplishment.


Source for the 410B in new pork.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Obama Is Lying about Earmarks in the 'Stimulus' Bill

Obama has the gall to claim that there are no earmarks in the stimulus bill. This is an absolute boldfaced lie. So much for the new way of doing business in Washington. Its even more ironic that it is the Associated Press (a 'news' organization that was nearly openly campaigning for Obama in November) who is calling Obama out on his lies.

FACT CHECK: Obama has it both ways on pork

By CALVIN WOODWARD

WASHINGTON (AP) - At least Route 31 is a road to somewhere.

President Barack Obama had it both ways Monday when he promoted his stimulus plan in Indiana. He bragged about getting Congress to produce a package with no pork, yet boasted it will do good things for a Hoosier highway and a downtown overpass, just the kind of local projects lawmakers lard into big spending bills.

Obama's sales pitch on the enormous package he wants Congress to make law has sizzle as well as steak. He's projecting job creation numbers that may be impossible to verify and glossing over some ethical problems that bedeviled his team.

In recent years, the so-called Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska came to symbolize the worst excesses of congressional earmarks, a device that allows a member of Congress to add money for local projects in legislation, practically under the radar.

Nothing so bold, or specific, as that now-discarded bridge project is contained in the stimulus package. That's not to say the package steers clear of waste or parochial interests. Obama played to such interests Monday, speaking at one point as if he'd come to fill potholes.

A look at some of Obama's claims in Elkhart, Ind., in advance of a prime-time news conference called to make his case to the largest possible audience:

OBAMA: "I know that there are a lot of folks out there who've been saying, 'Oh, this is pork, and this is money that's going to be wasted,' and et cetera, et cetera. Understand, this bill does not have a single earmark in it, which is unprecedented for a bill of this size. ... There aren't individual pork projects that members of Congress are putting into this bill."

THE FACTS: There are no "earmarks," as they are usually defined, inserted by lawmakers in the bill. Still, some of the projects bear the prime characteristics of pork - tailored to benefit specific interests or to have thinly disguised links to local projects.

For example, the latest version contains $2 billion for a clean-coal power plant with specifications matching one in Mattoon, Ill., $10 million for urban canals, $2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars, and $255 million for a polar icebreaker and other "priority procurements" by the Coast Guard.

Obama told his Elkhart audience that Indiana will benefit from work on "roads like U.S. 31 here in Indiana that Hoosiers count on." He added: "And I know that a new overpass downtown would make a big difference for businesses and families right here in Elkhart."

U.S. 31 is a north-south highway serving South Bend, 15 miles from Elkhart in the northern part of the state.

OBAMA: "I've appointed hundreds of people, all of whom are outstanding Americans who are doing a great job. There are a couple who had problems before they came into my administration, in terms of their taxes. ... I made a mistake ... I don't want to send the signal that there are two sets of rules."

He added: "Everybody will acknowledge that we have set up the highest standard ever for lobbyists not working in the administration."

THE FACTS: Two of his appointees, former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle for secretary of health and human services and Nancy Killefer as his chief compliance officer, dropped out after reports they had not paid a portion of their taxes.

Obama previously acknowledged he "screwed up" in making it seem to Americans that there is one set of tax compliance rules for VIPs and another set for everyone else. Yet his choice for treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, hung in and achieved the post despite having belatedly paid $34,000 to the IRS, an agency Geithner now oversees.

That could leave the perception that there is one set of rules for Geithner and another set for everyone else.

On lobbyists, Obama has in fact established tough new rules barring them from working for his administration. But the ban is not absolute.

William J. Lynn III, tapped to be the No. 2 official at the Defense Department, recently lobbied for military contractor Raytheon. William Corr, chosen as deputy secretary at Health and Human Services, has lobbied as an anti-tobacco advocate. And Geithner's choice for chief of staff, Mark Patterson, is an ex-lobbyist from Goldman Sachs.

OBAMA: "The plan that we've put forward will save or create 3 million to 4 million jobs over the next two years."

THE FACTS: Job creation projections are uncertain even in stable times, and some of the economists relied on by Obama in making his forecast acknowledge a great deal of uncertainty in their numbers.

Beyond that, it's unlikely the nation will ever know how many jobs are saved as a result of the stimulus. While it's clear when jobs are abolished, there's no economic gauge that tracks job preservation.


Source

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Iran Says that Obama's Offer to Talk Shows Weakness

This should come as no surprise to anyone, expert perhaps to Messrs Obama, Reid, and Ms. Pelosi that Iran is seeing Obama's offer to negotiate with them as weakness. Obama apologists will probably approach this as 'Oh well, we tried. Give peace a chance', but the reality of the situation is much more dangerous. Iran's leaders, now emboldened by the perceived weak-kneed foreign policy of the new administration are much more likely to accelerate development of weapons of mass destruction and adopt a more aggressive foreign stance. It is also likely that Israel will not take kindly to this and will put a stop to any shenanigans if Obama is unwilling to, risking a regional war.

Thus, Islamo-fascists in the middle east emboldened by Obama's perceived weakness will seek to capitalize on the opportunity and will make attempts to attack Israel and Western nations. People are probably going to die because the Democrats think that appeasing evil will lead to peace. Sadly history has shown time and time again this is just not true. We can only hope that the number of lives sacrificed at the alter of liberalism will be small.


Iran says Obama's offer to talk shows US failure

US President Barack Obama's offer to talk to Iran shows that America's policy of "domination" has failed, the government spokesman said on Saturday.

"This request means Western ideology has become passive, that capitalist thought and the system of domination have failed," Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency.

"Negotiation is secondary, the main issue is that there is no way but for (the United States) to change," he added.

After nearly three decades of severed ties, Obama said shortly after taking office this month that he is willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to "unclench its fist".

In response, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a fresh tirade against the United States, demanding an apology for its "crimes" against Iran and saying he expected "deep and fundamental" change from Obama.

Iranian politicians frequently refer to the US administration as the "global arrogance", "domineering power" and "Great Satan".

Tensions with the United States have soared over Iran's nuclear drive and Ahmadinejad's vitriolic verbal attacks against Washington's close regional ally Israel.

Former US president George W. Bush refused to hold talks with the Islamic republic -- which he dubbed part of an "axis of evil" -- unless it suspended uranium enrichment, and never took a military option to thwart Tehran's atomic drive off the table.

The new administration of Obama has also refused to rule out any options -- including military strikes -- to stop Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Iran denies any plans to build the bomb and insists its nuclear programme is solely aimed at peaceful ends.

Source